United States v. Wetherald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when a vagueness challenge does not involve the First Amendment, the analysis must be based on the facts of the case
• explaining that an error raised for the first time on appeal is reviewed for plain error
• “The district court is not required to utter a set of magic words . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).