Skip to main content
· 2/17/1995

United States v. Western Electric Company, Inc. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Bellsouth Corporation, Bell Atlantic Corporation

Citations

  • 46 F.3d 1198
  • 310 U.S. App. D.C. 281
  • 31 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 657
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2975
  • 1995 WL 62775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “a trial court has inherent power to control the sequence in which it hears matters on its calendar”
  • noting that requests to relieve an enjoined party of an injunction’s constraints comes within Rule 60(b)(5) whereas requests to “tighten the decree in order to accomplish its intended result” fall within the court’s equitable discretion
  • Modifications at the request of the enjoined party relieving it of the decree’s constraints “come within Rule 60(b)(5). . . .”
  • “The power of a court of equity to modify a decree of injunctive relief . . . is long-established, broad, and flexible.” (quoting N.Y. State Ass’n for Retarded Child., Inc. v. Carey, 706 F.2d 956, 967 (2d Cir. 1983))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Randolph, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.