Skip to main content
· 6/25/1987

United States v. Wesley R. McKinney

Citations

  • 822 F.2d 946
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7963
  • 23 Fed. R. Serv. 606

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the district court gave the jury a full-fledged Allen instruction” after which “[t]he jury again resumed its deliberation, and an hour and twenty minutes later returned a unanimous verdict”
  • concluding there was no coercion where verdict reached on twenty-nine counts in one hour and twenty minutes after receiving instruction
  • concluding there was no coercion where verdict reached on twenty-nine counts in one hour and twenty minutes after receiving instruction
  • stating that “requested instructions that are . . . repetitious are correctly refused”
  • upholding the instruction when jury reported agreement on three of thirty-two counts but could not agree on remaining counts
  • that \defendant later offers repayment . . . does not negate an earlier intent to defraud\ under Federal bank fraud statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barrett, Baldock, McWilliams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.