United States v. Wesley Lloyd Nakagawa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court did not err at sentencing by considering “aspects of [the defendant’s] offense that were not specified in the information to which he pled guilty.”
• “[T]he guidelines d[o] not limit the court to elements of the charged offense as possible grounds for departure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).