Seventh Circuit· 12/23/2003
United States v. Wesley Bowman
Citations
- 353 F.3d 546
- 63 Fed. R. Serv. 36
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 26154
- 2003 WL 22999284
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing similar comments in closing arguments and determining that all were proper based on the witnesses and evidence presented at trial
- noting prosecutor never “asked the jury to draw the inference that because Bowman had admitted problems abiding by the law, he must be guilty”
- noting prosecutor never “asked the jury to draw the inference that because Bowman had admitted problems abiding by the law, he must be guilty”
- discussing similar com- ments in closing arguments and determining that all were proper based on the witnesses and evidence pre- sented at trial
- finding the prosecutor’s emphasis on the defendant’s past criminal behavior and the police offi cer’s version of the events to be supported by facts in the record and thus used for permissive purposes
- finding the prosecutor’s emphasis on the defendant’s past criminal behavior and the police officer’s version of the events to be supported by facts in the record and thus used for permissive pur- poses
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Kanne, Evans
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. BellSeventh Circuit· 2010-10-20· cited 131×
- United States v. OrosSeventh Circuit· 2009-08-25· cited 107×
- United States v. Rodney McLee and Vicki Murph-JacksonSeventh Circuit· 2006-02-02· cited 106×
- United States v. Robert SimpsonSeventh Circuit· 2007-03-13· cited 77×
- United States v. WebberSeventh Circuit· 2008-07-29· cited 77×
- United States v. TannerSeventh Circuit· 2010-12-17· cited 74×
- United States v. Theodore RichardsSeventh Circuit· 2013-06-14· cited 64×
- United States v. Roy GloverSeventh Circuit· 2007-03-14· cited 51×
- United States v. Dexter Anderson, A/K/A Dek, and Valencia Y. ParsonsSeventh Circuit· 2006-06-09· cited 50×
- United States v. TurnerSeventh Circuit· 2011-07-11· cited 44×
- United States v. KincannonSeventh Circuit· 2009-06-08· cited 37×
- United States v. GibsonSeventh Circuit· 2008-06-26· cited 36×
- United States v. NunezSeventh Circuit· 2008-07-11· cited 36×
- United States v. KimotoSeventh Circuit· 2009-12-02· cited 35×
- United States v. CampbellSeventh Circuit· 2008-07-15· cited 32×
- United States v. ClarkSeventh Circuit· 2008-07-23· cited 25×
- Fredrick Baer v. Ron NealSeventh Circuit· 2018-01-11· cited 19×
- United States v. Charles Pollock, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 2014-07-01· cited 17×
- United States v. SquibbSeventh Circuit· 2008-07-17· cited 14×
- United States v. Adolph CommonSeventh Circuit· 2016-04-04· cited 14×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Ruben PulidoSeventh Circuit· 1995-11-02· cited 110×
- United States v. Marvin J. ZylstraSeventh Circuit· 1983-08-09· cited 83×
- United States v. Robert AmersonSeventh Circuit· 1999-07-19· cited 81×
- United States v. David AldacoSeventh Circuit· 2000-01-21· cited 81×
- United States v. Hector SandovalSeventh Circuit· 2003-10-20· cited 78×
- United States v. Paul Van DreelSeventh Circuit· 1998-09-15· cited 72×
- United States v. Carlan D. HodgesSeventh Circuit· 2003-01-09· cited 58×
- United States v. Plaze E. Anderson, Also Known as Plaze ThomasSeventh Circuit· 2002-09-19· cited 42×
- United States v. Charles W. WilsonSeventh Circuit· 1993-02-08· cited 41×
- United States v. Isaac Lamont HoltSeventh Circuit· 1987-04-28· cited 27×
- Gonzalez-Vargas v. United States Herrera-Ortega v. United States Neal-Estrada v. United States and Perez-Avalos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2003-05-05· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.