United States v. Wendy Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that evidentiary issue is reviewed for plain error after defendants failed to object
• applying plain error review to unpreserved challenge to admissibility of character evidence
• affirming conviction where “the totality of the circumstances . . . , including the jury instructions, the verdict form provided to the jury, the arguments of the parties, and the evidence” did not support the conclusion that a constructive amendment occurred
• “[W]hen a constructive amendment claim rests on allegedly erroneous jury instructions, a reviewing court is to consider the totality of the circumstances.”
• “[W]hen a constructive amendment claim rests on allegedly erroneous jury instructions, a reviewing court is to consider the totality of the circumstances.”
• “[W]hen a constructive amendment claim rests on allegedly erroneous jury instructions, a reviewing court is to consider the totality of the circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).