United States v. Wendell T. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[D]rug offenses committed at ‘distinct, different times’ will be treated as separate predicate offenses for purposes of § 924(e)(1
• “Although it is not a necessary inference from a broken side vent window that a car has been stolen, it is ... a reasonable inference.”
• government does not contend shoplifting is a violent felony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).