· 3/29/2000
United States v. Wen Ho Lee
Citations
- 90 F. Supp. 2d 1324
- 90 F. Supp. 1324
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7494
- 2000 WL 339502
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “CIPA requires no more revelation of the defendant’s thoughts or plans than do the notice of alibi and similar rules of federal criminal procedure.”
- “it is obvious and unarguable that no governmental interest is more compelling than the security of the Nation”
- “it is obvious and unarguable that no governmental interest is more compelling than the national security of the Nation”
- “the burdens of discovery under CIPA and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure are carefully balanced”
- “CIPA does not require that the defense reveal its plan of cross-examination ... what questions ... counsel will ask, in which order, and to which witnesses.”
- upholding constitutionality of the CIPA discovery provisions and Section 5
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Conway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.