Skip to main content
· 3/29/2000

United States v. Wen Ho Lee

Citations

  • 90 F. Supp. 2d 1324
  • 90 F. Supp. 1324
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7494
  • 2000 WL 339502

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “CIPA requires no more revelation of the defendant’s thoughts or plans than do the notice of alibi and similar rules of federal criminal procedure.”
  • “it is obvious and unarguable that no governmental interest is more compelling than the security of the Nation”
  • “it is obvious and unarguable that no governmental interest is more compelling than the national security of the Nation”
  • “the burdens of discovery under CIPA and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure are carefully balanced”
  • “CIPA does not require that the defense reveal its plan of cross-examination ... what questions ... counsel will ask, in which order, and to which witnesses.”
  • upholding constitutionality of the CIPA discovery provisions and Section 5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.