United States v. Weinstock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that an affidavit affected an interest in property because of plaintiffs claim that he was the legal and beneficial owner of 35,000 shares of stock and therefore finding the document admissible under Rule 803(15)
• finding a list of weapons the defendant owned to be a document which “affects an interest in property”
• admitting an affidavit claiming ownership of 35,000 shares under Rule 803(15) to show defendant who allegedly forged endorsement never held ownership interest the certificate
• an affidavit claiming ownership of 35,000 shares of stock, filed after the stock certificate was “lost,” was admitted under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(15
• the circumstances of an affidavit’s execution supported the conclusion that the declarations therein were trustworthy
• the circumstances of an affidavit’s execution supported the conclusion that the declarations therein were trustworthy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).