Skip to main content
· 7/1/1960

United States v. Weinstein

Citations

  • 11 C.M.A. 599
  • 11 USCMA 599
  • 29 C.M.R. 415
  • 1960 CMA LEXIS 261
  • 1960 WL 4525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • willing buyer of the license is considered to be the party that will manufacture the item
  • willing buyer of the license is considered to be the party which will manufacture the item
  • including in the royalty base plugins that were physically separate but “financially dependent on the market created by the patented” component
  • adopting the “method, exemplified by the 2 Georgia-Pacific case” for determining damages
  • affirming the trial court’s rejection of the methods proposed by parties’ experts and determination that the best method of computing compensation would be to ascertain a reasonable royalty rate by applying the willing-buyer/willing-seller method discussed in Georgia-Pacific
  • adopting the “method, exemplified by the Georgia-Pacific case” for determining damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ferguson, Latimer, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.