Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 6/12/1985

United States v. Weinstein

Citations

  • 762 F.2d 1522
  • 18 Fed. R. Serv. 757

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that two warrants were not invalid, despite designating the wrong corner of a building to be searched, because the officers knew the correct location to be searched
  • analyzing the existence of a RICO enterprise as a fact question for the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fay, Hill, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Weinstein

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.