· 7/1/1960
United States v. Weinstein
Citations
- 11 C.M.A. 599
- 11 USCMA 599
- 29 C.M.R. 415
- 1960 CMA LEXIS 261
- 1960 WL 4525
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- willing buyer of the license is considered to be the party that will manufacture the item
- willing buyer of the license is considered to be the party which will manufacture the item
- including in the royalty base plugins that were physically separate but “financially dependent on the market created by the patented” component
- adopting the “method, exemplified by the 2 Georgia-Pacific case” for determining damages
- affirming the trial court’s rejection of the methods proposed by parties’ experts and determination that the best method of computing compensation would be to ascertain a reasonable royalty rate by applying the willing-buyer/willing-seller method discussed in Georgia-Pacific
- adopting the “method, exemplified by the Georgia-Pacific case” for determining damages
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ferguson, Latimer, Quinn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.