Skip to main content
· 4/8/1946

United States v. Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc.

Citations

  • 16 Cust. Ct. 346
  • 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a party engaged in misconduct by failing to provide discovery pursuant to a court order based on an unreasonable interpretation of the document at issue
  • holding that a discovery violation mate- rially affected the plaintiff’s rights because it deprived the plaintiff of the ability to fully rebut the defendant’s argu- ment at trial
  • affirming a new-trial order and, consequently, declining to address assignments of error to evidentiary and instructional rulings made at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kincheloe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.