United States v. Weathers, Marc K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that criminal rule 12 not subject to plain error review and noting that the rule thus deprives an appellate court of “authority to reverse a conviction” on waived grounds
• holding that criminal rule 12 not subject to plain error review and noting that the rule thus deprives an appellate court of \authority to reverse a conviction\ on waived grounds
• concluding that plain error review under Rule 52(b) of a \waived\ issue would render Rule 12(f) meaningless
• concluding that plain error review under Rule 52(b) of a \waived\ issue would render Rule 12(f) meaningless
• concluding that plain error review under Rule 52(b) of a \waived\ issue would render Rule 12(f) meaningless
• concluding that untimely claims of error pursuant to Rule 12 are waived on appeal and “may not be revived” absent a showing of good cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).