United States v. Wayne E. Kwiat, Edward J. McKeown and Kevin D. Kehoe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to find judicial misconduct where judge “showed asperity in front of the jury no more than five times during an extended trial”
• reversing a mail fraud conviction where “honest services would have produced the same sort of mailings” as the ones the defendants made
• reversing mail fraud conviction of corporate officer through scheme for self‐deal‐ ing: “Neither the language nor the legislative history of § 1341 hints that it is an all‐purpose remedy for corporate misman‐ agement.”
• “Yet a judge also must regulate the conduct of a trial, and this will require taking sides in skir-mishes_”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).