Skip to main content
· 4/23/2004

United States v. Wayne County, Mich.

Citations

  • 369 F.3d 508
  • 95 Fed. Appx. 809
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8298
  • 2004 WL 886936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Rufo standards apply to city’s motion to amend negotiated consent decree with county and downriver communities resolving action under Clean Water Act
  • “The modification of a consent decree by a court without the consent of all parties to the agreement is indeed a signal event that requires a material change in circumstances that only a formal hearing and appropriate findings of fact can demonstrate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.