· 6/16/1995
United States v. Waymer
Citations
- 55 F.3d 564
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14916
- 1995 WL 326208
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the “[a]pplication of the overbreadth doctrine is employed as a last re- sort and is not to be invoked when a limiting construction has been or could be placed on the challenged statute”
- overbreadth “is not to be invoked when a limiting construc- tion has been or could be placed on the challenged statute”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hatchett, Cox, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.