Skip to main content
· 6/16/1995

United States v. Waymer

Citations

  • 55 F.3d 564
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14916
  • 1995 WL 326208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the “[a]pplication of the overbreadth doctrine is employed as a last re- sort and is not to be invoked when a limiting construction has been or could be placed on the challenged statute”
  • overbreadth “is not to be invoked when a limiting construc- tion has been or could be placed on the challenged statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hatchett, Cox, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.