United States v. Warren S. Chang

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the proponent of evidence has the burden of proving the foundational requirements for its admission by a preponderance of the evidence
• finding expert was qualified to testify in area of international finance but not qualified to testify about counterfeit securities because it was beyond the witness’s expertise
• finding expert was qualified to testify in area of international finance but not qualified to testify about counterfeit securities because it was beyond the witness’s expertise
• finding 11 “extremely qualified” international finance expert was properly precluded from testifying about 12 authenticity of certificate at issue because detection/identification of counterfeit securities was 13 beyond witness’s expertise
• all stating that the proponent of evidence has the burden of proof and must lay appropriate foundation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).