Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 9/30/2005

United States v. Warner

Citations

62 M.J. 114
2005 CAAF LEXIS 1110
2005 WL 2452547

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

requiring the defense expert to “have qualifications reasonably similar to those of the Government’s”
“Relevant facts are drawn from the record of trial, and we accept the factual findings of the courts of criminal appeals unless they are clearly erroneous.”
by availing itself of the pretrial assistance of the preeminent expert in shaken baby syndrome, while providing the defense with an expert consultant with far inferior credentials in the field, the government violated Article 46, UCMJ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gierke, Crawford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.