United States v. Warneke, Carl J.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a defendant may violate § 1962(d) by “join[ing] forces with someone else who manages or operates the enterprise.”
• noting that “an admission of relevant conduct in a plea agreement is even better than a jury’s finding beyond a reasonable doubt”
• explaining that plea‐colloquy admission is even stronger than jury’s finding beyond a reasonable doubt
• explaining that plea‐colloquy admission is even stronger than jury’s finding beyond a reasonable doubt
• remarking that stipulation in plea agreement “removes all contest from the case”
• remarking that stipulation in plea agreement “removes all contest from the case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).