United States v. Wardell Washington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming upward departure from Category IV where defendant had resumed criminal activity promptly upon each release from prison; noting that it seemed only incarceration had kept criminal history low
• explaining that this prohibition is a bright-line rule
• \An officer is not required to believe the statements of a suspect.\
• applying the “unitary abuse of discretion standard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).