United States v. Wansley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial counsel's statements in a post-trial article would not be imputed to the staff judge advocate, who expressly stated that the remarks were not made on his or the convening authority’s behalf
• holding that trial counsel’s statements in a post-trial article would not be imputed to the staff judge advocate, who expressly stated that the remarks were not made on his or the convening authority’s behalf

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).