United States v. Wansley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial counsel's statements in a post-trial article would not be imputed to the staff judge advocate, who expressly stated that the remarks were not made on his or the convening authority’s behalf
• holding that trial counsel’s statements in a post-trial article would not be imputed to the staff judge advocate, who expressly stated that the remarks were not made on his or the convening authority’s behalf

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2004-08-20· cited 26×
• United States v. Bradley
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1999-09-17· cited 12×
• United States v. Bradley
  Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals· 1997-10-29· cited 4×
• United States v. Mac
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2016-04-21

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Loving v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 415×
• United States v. Loving
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1994-11-10· cited 366×
• United States v. Chatman
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1997-08-18· cited 151×
• United States v. Edwards
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1996-09-24· cited 22×
• United States v. Rice
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1991-12-09· cited 21×
• United States v. Fernandez
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1987-05-11· cited 18×
• United States v. Fisher
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1996-09-27· cited 9×
• United States v. Johnson
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1977-11-07· cited 7×
• United States v. Reynolds
  U.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1993-03-25· cited 6×