Skip to main content
· 3/18/1966

United States v. Wanhainen

Citations

  • 16 C.M.A. 143
  • 16 USCMA 143
  • 36 C.M.R. 299
  • 1966 CMA LEXIS 290
  • 1966 WL 4463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Category one recovery will be denied if the contract documents do not ‘show’ or ‘indicate’ anything about the alleged changed condition.”
  • “The drought conditions plaintiff complains about resulted solely from extended dry weather conditions which can properly be classified as an act of God.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Day, Ferguson, Kil, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.