United States v. Waltman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that surrender of a personal diary in response to subpoena did not moot appeal because “if the diary is not a corporate record, the individual respondent is entitled to its return and appropriate suppression of the use of its contents”
• “if this personal record [diary] was mingled with notations of a corporate nature, the document loses the cloak of protection and privilege guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Paul Gluck and Ina Gluck v. United States of America, Sidney Stein Stein & Stein Stein's Foot Specialties, Inc. v. United States
  Third Circuit· 1985-08-28· cited 45×
• Office of Thrift Supervision, Department of the Treasury v. Walter Dobbs
  D.C. Circuit· 1991-05-03· cited 30×
• United States v. Robert MacKey
  Ninth Circuit· 1981-06-12· cited 29×
• In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, Etc.
  S.D. New York· 1981-09-09· cited 14×
• United States v. Waltman
  Third Circuit· 1975-11-07
• In Re: Grand Jury
  Third Circuit· 2006-04-21

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Simmons v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
• United States v. White
  Supreme Court· 1944-06-12· cited 772×
• United States v. McCarthy
  Third Circuit· 1975-04-10· cited 94×
• United States v. Albert Shlom
  Second Circuit· 1969-12-19· cited 44×

Other cases named United States v. Waltman

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Waltman
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1975-06-04· cited 2×
• United States v. Waltman
  Third Circuit· 1975-11-07