United States v. Waltman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that surrender of a personal diary in response to subpoena did not moot appeal because “if the diary is not a corporate record, the individual respondent is entitled to its return and appropriate suppression of the use of its contents”
• “if this personal record [diary] was mingled with notations of a corporate nature, the document loses the cloak of protection and privilege guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Waltman

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Waltman
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1975-06-04· cited 2×
• United States v. Waltman
  Third Circuit· 1975-11-07