United States v. Walter Teel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[W]e read Skilling as recognizing that § 1346 prosecutions may involve misconduct that is also a violation of state law.\
• on subsequent appeal, our court “abstains from reexamining an issue of fact or law that has already been decided on appeal”
• \[W]e read Skilling as recognizing that § 1346 prosecutions may involve misconduct that is also a violation of state law.\
• \[T]he court properly utilized its discretion to vary from the Guidelines by taking into account [the defendant's] financial resources when determining the appropriately punitive fine in the first instance.\
• “[T]he 18 court properly utilized its discretion to vary from the Guidelines by taking into account [the defendant’s] financial resources when determining the appropriately punitive fine in the first instance.”
• bribery and fraud prison terms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).