United States v. Walter R. Tucker, III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding against a sufficiency of the evidence challenge Hobbs Act color of official right extortion convictions
• upholding against a sufficiency of the evidence challenge Hobbs Act color of official right extortion convictions
• upholding against a sufficiency of the evidence challenge Hobbs Act color of official right extortion convic- tions
• \The government need not show an explicit agreement ... the government need only show that [the public official] received the payment knowing that [it] was made in return for official acts\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “The government need not show an explicit agreement ... the government need only show that [the public official] received the payment knowing that [it] was made in return for official acts” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “The gov- ernment need not show an explicit agreement . . . the govern- ment need only show that [the public official] received the payment knowing that [it] was made in return for official acts” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).