Skip to main content
· 1/28/2004

United States v. Walter Nelson

Citations

  • 356 F.3d 719
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1218
  • 2004 WL 136360

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating No. 07-3449 United States v. Simmons Page 17 defendant’s sentence when the “district court gave no indication as to how it calculated the loss and determined that the government’s calculations were correct [and failed to] respond to Nelson’s specific objections.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Sutton, Mills

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.