· 1/28/2004
United States v. Walter Nelson
Citations
- 356 F.3d 719
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1218
- 2004 WL 136360
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- vacating No. 07-3449 United States v. Simmons Page 17 defendant’s sentence when the “district court gave no indication as to how it calculated the loss and determined that the government’s calculations were correct [and failed to] respond to Nelson’s specific objections.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martin, Sutton, Mills
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.