United States v. Walter J. Connell, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that reviewing courts may make logical inferences from Miranda rights explicitly given
• finding warnings insufficient when the defendant was given oral Miranda warnings at the same time as he was reading written warnings that provided conflicting information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).