United States v. Walter Higginbotham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no prejudice resulted from admission of identification evidence because jury heard cross-examination of identifying witness
• destruction of photo array used in identification, but mere negligence involved by state officials could not be imputed to federal officials
• discussing techniques for attacking credibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).