United States v. Walter Dzielinski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the district court’s application of the enhancement pre-1989 Amendment because it “relied upon the failure of the [g]uidelines to adequately consider the threat posed by the possession of what appeared to be a dangerous weapon”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).