United States v. Walter Barnes, III and Leslie Carl Coleman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e do not find any error in the 16 prosecutor’s eliciting from Barnes the length of his confinement.”
• “[W]e do not find any error in the 1 prosecutor’s eliciting from Barnes the length of his confinement.”
• '[T]he defense could not inquire about her previous convictions in violation of Rule 609(a)(2) just to set her up for impeachment by a prior inconsistent statement.'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).