United States v. Wallace Jarvis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• informing witness of correctness or incorrectness of pretrial identification might taint later identification so as to require reversal
• photographs and palmprints not tainted by illegal arrest where probable cause existed to arrest defendant and illegal arrest not a “but for” cause of the introduction of the evidence
• practice of telling witnesses whether identifications are “correct” or not, could so taint an identification as to require exclu- sion of evidence
• ‘‘[t]o comply with . . . the fourth amendment the name or a particularized descrip- tion of the person to be arrested must appear on the face of the ‘John Doe’ warrant’’ (emphasis added)
• description required in “John Doe” arrest warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).