United States v. Waldroop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding constitutional Booker error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because there was no reason to believe the district court would impose a different sentence upon remand
• observing that the district court voiced its disapproval of defendant’s greed at sentencing
• noting district court imposed highest possible sentence upon defendant and concluding court would not reduce sentence on remand
• discussing evidence that the defendant “came up with the plan to use nominee loans as a way around [the bank’s borrowing] limit” and that the defendant had stated that “he personally could not get a loan” and had therefore suggested that the co-defendant sign the loan application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).