United States v. Walbert Farmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that judges are required to “give a reason, consistent with the sentencing factors in section 3553(a), for every discretionary part of the sentence that the judge is imposing, including any non‐man‐ datory conditions of supervised release”
• vacating a search condition that required “no suspicion, reasonable or otherwise, to trigger a search”
• finding no waiver in part because defendant did not affirmatively say “no objection” to condition of supervised release challenged on appeal
• vacating a search condition that required “no suspicion, reasonable or otherwise,” to justify a search
• leaving open standard of review question where “the outcome ... is the same regardless of the standard” applied
• acknowledging “tension in our cases as to the proper standard of review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).