United States v. Wainer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that before compelling discovery implicating the respondent’s First Amendment rights, the court must assess “whether the information goes to the ‘heart of the lawsuit’”
• stating that before compelling discovery implicating the respondent's First Amendment rights, the court must assess \whether the information goes to the 'heart of the lawsuit' \
• “all relevant documents . . . would be in the hands of the . . . defendants”
• “Before compelling discovery [in cases where the First Amendment rights are implicated], [a] court must assess (1) whether the information goes to the heart of the lawsuit, (2) whether the party seeking the discovery sought the information through alternative sources, and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).