United States v. Wade, Charles Edward

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, even if an earlier opinion could be read to reach the relevant issue, “[b]ecause that issue was not before the court, its overly broad language would be obiter dicta and not entitled to deference”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).