United States v. Wabo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the Superseding Indictment contains sufficient factual and legal information for the defense to prepare its case. Although the victims are identified by initials, it is not essential that an indictment identify victims by their given names.”
• holding “it is not essential that an indictment identify victims by their given names” and an indictment identifying victims by their initials contains “sufficient factual and legal information for the defense to prepare its case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).