United States v. Vishnu Meda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that if motion to dismiss indictment for prosecu-torial vindictiveness is untimely, standard of review is plain error
• holding argument in brief that was not supported by citation need not be addressed by the court pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(a)(8)(A)
• reiterating that a vindictive prosecution claim requires a showing of the “unreasonableness of the prosecutor’s conduct”
• discussing the applicable standard where a defendant moves to dismiss an indictment on 7 The government asked for an upward variance on count II (carjacking, allowing for a 180-month maximum
• “No citation was provided to support this proposition. Thus, it need not be addressed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).