Skip to main content
· 1/9/1991

United States v. Virgil Shacklett

Citations

  • 921 F.2d 580
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 192
  • 1991 WL 957

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating sentence because district court relied solely on probation’s officer’s conclusory statement as to drug quantity involved
  • stating “this court will evaluate such failure to comply with Rule 11 under a harmless error analysis that focuses on whether the defendant’s substantive rights were affected”
  • stating “this court will evaluate such failure to comply with Rule 11 under a harmless error analysis that focuses on whether the defendant’s substantive rights were affected”
  • drug total in PSI lacked sufficient indicia of reliability because source of facts was unidentified

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Per Curiam, Wiener, Yela

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.