United States v. Viren R. Patel, A/K/A Victor R. Patel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• increase under § 2C1.1 based upon amount of the $50,000 bribe, not the $600,000 amount bid for government property
• “[T]he government must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant intended to reward [the official] for past action or action [the official] was already committed to take.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).