Skip to main content
· 2/1/2006

United States v. Vincent Sharp

Citations

  • 436 F.3d 730
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2438
  • 2006 WL 230271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the defendant's awareness of his own false testimony put him \on notice that [his testimony] could result in a possible obstruction of justice enhancement\
  • finding that the argument that the law of the case doctrine applied “ha[d] no merit since the court below vacated its original judgment”
  • upholding increase under § 3C1.1 where defendant lied at sentencing about drug quantity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Bauer, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.