Skip to main content
· 3/30/2021

United States v. Vinasco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant because the defendant’s lack of history of fainting and inability to foresee the possibility of fainting were corroborated by his physician’s testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.