Skip to main content
· 2/11/2009

United States v. Viking Resources, Inc.

Citations

  • 607 F. Supp. 2d 808
  • 174 Oil & Gas Rep. 502
  • 39 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20046
  • 69 ERC (BNA) 1663
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10748
  • 2009 WL 365682

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the OPA definition of facility “clearly allows a facility to consist of multiple structures and pieces of equipment”
  • setting forth costs and damages as but one of several claims in an OPA recovery action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sim Lake

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.