· 2/11/2009
United States v. Viking Resources, Inc.
Citations
- 607 F. Supp. 2d 808
- 174 Oil & Gas Rep. 502
- 39 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20046
- 69 ERC (BNA) 1663
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10748
- 2009 WL 365682
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing the OPA definition of facility “clearly allows a facility to consist of multiple structures and pieces of equipment”
- setting forth costs and damages as but one of several claims in an OPA recovery action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sim Lake
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.