United States v. Victor Valenzuela-Arisqueta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court lacked jurisdiction to proceed to trial while an interlocutory appeal was pending
• holding that the district court lacked jurisdiction to proceed to trial while an interlocutory appeal was pending
• even if jeopardy had attached when trial court accepted guilty plea without an adequate colloquy, jeopardy did not terminate - 23 - 2014 IL App (2d
• even if jeopardy had attached when trial court accepted guilty plea without an adequate colloquy, jeopardy did not terminate improperly were trial court later rejected the plea as invalid
• “Because the propriety of the district court’s ruling was arguably not clear from our precedent, Valenzuela’s double jeopardy argument was ‘colorable,’ and we have jurisdiction over his appeal.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).