Skip to main content
· 8/1/1991

United States v. Victor Morgan

Citations

  • 942 F.2d 243
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 17233
  • 1991 WL 141026

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “if the district court decides to adopt the proposed findings in the presentence report as its resolution of disputed facts, the record must be clear regarding which disputed issues were resolved by the adoption”
  • indicating that the mere imposition of a sentence consistent with the presentence report does not satisfy the requirement of an express finding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, Wilkins, Chapman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.