United States v. Vicioso-Urena

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting expert’s purported reliance on NFPA 921 does not automatically make opinion admissible
• “NFPA 921 § 4.3.6 provides that a hypothesis can be tested either physically by conducting experiments or analytically by applying scientific principles in ‘thought experiments.’”
• “The requirement to provide a report containing all bases for an expert’s opinion is intended to permit opposing counsel to effectively prepare to depose the expert in advance of trial.”
• “The requirement to provide a report containing all bases for an expert’s opinion is intended to permit opposing counsel to effectively prepare to depose the expert in advance of trial.”
• “The requirement to provide a report containing all bases for an expert’s opinion is intended to permit opposing counsel to effectively prepare to depose the expert in advance of trial.”
• “The requirement to provide a report containing all bases for an expert’s opinion is intended to permit opposing counsel to effectively prepare to depose the expert in advance of trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).