United States v. Vetta Linwood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding testimony was not hearsay where offered to show its effect on witness
• a statement used to explain why someone reacted as they did upon hearing a statement is admissible for a non- hearsay purpose
• defense counsel’s blanket objection to all jury instructions did not preserve objection to one particular jury instruction
• “Whether jury instructions correctly state the law is a matter we review de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).