Skip to main content
· 4/5/1994

United States v. Vere Michael

Citations

  • 17 F.3d 1383
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6384
  • 1994 WL 87530

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We refuse to impute knowledge of falsity to the prosecutor where a key government witness’[s] testimony is in conflict with another’s statement or testimony.”
  • “We refuse to impute knowledge of falsity to the prosecutor where a key government witness’[s] testimony is in conflict with another’s statement or testimony.”
  • “We refuse to impute knowledge of falsity to the prosecutor where a key government witness’ testimony is in conflict with an- other’s statement or testimony.”
  • “Although federal courts possess the authority to dismiss an indictment for governmental misconduct, dismissal is an extreme sanction which should be infrequently utilized.... Dismissal is only favored in the most egregious cases.” (alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black, Dyer, Alaimo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.