Skip to main content
· 1/18/2012

United States v. Ventura-Perez

Citations

  • 666 F.3d 670
  • 2012 WL 130716
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 985

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding defense counsel’s admissions will suffice to satisfy the modified categorical approach because “[c]ourts could not function properly if concessions by counsel cannot be relied upon”
  • “Courts could not function properly if concessions by counsel cannot be relied upon.”
  • “Courts could not function properly if concessions by counsel cannot be relied upon.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Murphy, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.