Eleventh Circuit· 7/12/2002

United States v. Venske

Citations

296 F.3d 1284
2002 WL 1491640

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that a district court does not err in declining to investigate juror misconduct when the defendant cannot show that the jurors were influenced by external sources
noting Rule 606(b)’s exclusion of statements involving “the jury’s deliberative process” and the “mental impressions of [a] juror”
vacating defendants’ sentences and remanding where the sentencing court did not determine beyond a reasonable doubt whether defendants conspired to commit a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(A)(i) or 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B)(i)
principal purpose of such rules “is to prevent ‘fishing expeditions in search of information with which to impeach jury verdicts’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Roney, Cox

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.