United States v. Veilleux

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• questioning, in dictum, ill-advised government concession that § 923(a) required proof that weapon was operable
• “By reporting a potential crime to the police, Gini could not 10 reasonably expect the information to remain secret.”
• “The statute, 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(3), . . . states, “The term ‘firearm’ means (A) any weapon ... which will or is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).