Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 4/27/2012

United States v. VandeBrake

Citations

  • 679 F.3d 1030
  • 2012 WL 1448486
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 8584

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that the district court “explained how the guideline . . . did not adequately account for[] [the defendant’s] particular offense conduct”
  • rejecting substantive-reasonableness challenge where “the district court not only explained at great length why it was concerned about [the antitrust guideline] in general, but more importantly, explained how the guideline applied to (or rather, did not adequately account for
  • affirming categorical rejection of Guideline for antitrust offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Beam, Bye

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. VandeBrake

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.